Skip to main content
Back to research

Case study

Prompts as the backbone of AI production

Tracking prompts during production revealed the need for structured prompt libraries, dictionaries, and metadata.

This case study is still being iterated on as we document workflows from recent shoots.

The tracking problem

Prompts generate the images, but the production problem is knowing which prompt created which result. Early on we stored prompts in GitHub and ended up with hundreds of markdown files that were hard to search and even harder to contextualize.

The prompt library system

We treat prompts like production assets. Each prompt entry stores:

  • Prompt text
  • Associated images
  • Model/seed/workflow details
  • Director notes

Prompts are tagged by character, shot type, environment, lighting, and emotion so teams can return to known combinations quickly.

Workflow translation layers

To make existing tools usable, we introduced a dictionary that maps CFG → Prompt Strength, Sampler → Image Style Engine, Seed → Variation Lock, and other filmmaker-friendly labels. Each entry pairs a plain-language explanation, a film analogy, and the technical meaning so learning the system feels gradual.